Recently, in Matthys v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC (In re Matthys), 2010 WL 2176086 (Bankr. S.D. Ind. 2010), a bankruptcy court held that a debtor does not have a private right of action against the creditor who listed the debtor’s full social security number on its proof of claim. This holding is consistent with what the majority of courts have held in similar cases. While the joint debtors in Matthys sought relief under various statutes, including Bankruptcy Code sections 105 and 107, the court found that no private right of action existed.
In Matthys, the debtors listed its lender as a secured creditor in their schedules. The lender’s servicing agent included the debtors’ full social security numbers when it filed an electronic proof of claim. The court granted the debtor’s Rule 9037 motion and removed the proof of claim from public access on PACER. Next, the debtors brought an adversary proceeding against the servicing agent seeking damages for violating several statutes, including Bankruptcy Code section 107, The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9037, and various tort claims such as invasion of privacy, negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligence. The court, however, found no private right of action existed under the Bankruptcy Code or any other statute. However, the court did send the complaint for contempt to trial, since the court, but not the debtors, has the power to do so. Section 105(a) provides that bankruptcy courts “may issue any order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this title.” The Matthys court concluded that it only had the power to hold the creditor in contempt, because the broad power under section 105 “is not limitless and . . . does not create a private right of action.” The court stressed that while a private right of action can be expressed or implied in a statute, courts are unwilling to go against congressional intent when searching for such a right.
Although several courts agree with the Matthys analysis, other courts do find that a private right of action exists under section 105(a). See In re Gregg, 428 B.R. 345 (Bankr. D.S.C. 2009); In re Killian, 2009 WL 2927950 (Bankr. D.S.C. July 23, 2009). For example, in McKenzie v. Biloxi Internal Medicine Clinic (In re McKenzie), 2010 WL 917262 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. March 10, 2010), the court held that it had the authority to compensate a debtor under section 105(a). McKenzie addressed similar facts to Matthys. The McKenzie court justified its decision by citing several rare cases where section 105 was used to compensate the complainant, typically for actual damages and attorney’s fees.
In re Matthys raises many concerns, both for debtors and creditors. Some courts do recognize a private right of action. Even if a debtor has no private right of action, the courts may still hold creditors in contempt under section 105. Thus, courts can and do hold creditors liable for violating Rule 9037.
Showing posts with label SSN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SSN. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Friday, August 13, 2010
Social Security Number Facts
You can check your identity for identity fraud free at MyIDScore.com; the personal information you share is collected in an opt-out manner. That is, you’ll have to send the company an e-mail to stop it from using your data to “make our fraud prevention tools better.”
There is a method to the assignment of Social Security numbers which can help a little bit in spotting frauds. The first three digits are determined by where you lived when you received your number; 596 to 599, for example, are issued to residents of Puerto Rico (yes, it’s part of the United States). The higher the number, the further west you lived at the time you received your number. There are no Social Security numbers starting with 900-999.
000 unused 387-399 WI 528-529 UT001-003 NH 400-407 KY 530
NV004-007 ME 408-415 TN 531-539 WA008-009 VT 416-424
AL 540-544 OR 010-034 MA 425-428 MS 545-573
CA 035-039 RI 429-432 AR 574 AK 040-049 CT 433-439
LA 575-576 HI 050-134 NY 440-448 OK 577-579
DC 135-158 NJ 449-467 TX 580
VI Virgin Islands 159-211 PA 468-477 MN 581-584
PR Puerto Rico212-220 MD 478-485 IA 585 NM 221-222 DE 486-500
MO 586 PI Pacific Islands* 223-231 VA 501-502
ND 587-588 MS 232-236 WV 503-504 SD 589-595
FL 237-246 NC 505-508 NE 596-599
PR Puerto Rico 247-251 SC 509-515 KS 600-601 AZ 252-260
GA 516-517 MT 602-626 CA 261-267
FL 518-519 ID *Guam, American Samoa, 268-302
OH 520 WY Northern Mariana Islands, 303-317
IN 521-524 CO Philippine Islands 318-361 IL 525
NM 362-386 MI 526-527 AZ 627-699
unassigned, for future use 700-728
Railroad workers through 1963, then discontinued 729-899 unassigned, for future use
900-999 not valid SSNs, but were used for program purposes when state aid to the aged, blind and disabled was converted to a federal program administered by SSA.
http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2010/08/13/your-social-security-number-may-not-be-unique-to-you/
https://annualcreditreport.experian.com/AnnualCreditReport/cac/ReportSummary2.do
https://www.myidscore.com/
http://w2.eff.org/Privacy/ID_SSN_fingerprinting/ssn_structure.article
http://stevemorse.org/ssn/ssn.html
There is a method to the assignment of Social Security numbers which can help a little bit in spotting frauds. The first three digits are determined by where you lived when you received your number; 596 to 599, for example, are issued to residents of Puerto Rico (yes, it’s part of the United States). The higher the number, the further west you lived at the time you received your number. There are no Social Security numbers starting with 900-999.
000 unused 387-399 WI 528-529 UT001-003 NH 400-407 KY 530
NV004-007 ME 408-415 TN 531-539 WA008-009 VT 416-424
AL 540-544 OR 010-034 MA 425-428 MS 545-573
CA 035-039 RI 429-432 AR 574 AK 040-049 CT 433-439
LA 575-576 HI 050-134 NY 440-448 OK 577-579
DC 135-158 NJ 449-467 TX 580
VI Virgin Islands 159-211 PA 468-477 MN 581-584
PR Puerto Rico212-220 MD 478-485 IA 585 NM 221-222 DE 486-500
MO 586 PI Pacific Islands* 223-231 VA 501-502
ND 587-588 MS 232-236 WV 503-504 SD 589-595
FL 237-246 NC 505-508 NE 596-599
PR Puerto Rico 247-251 SC 509-515 KS 600-601 AZ 252-260
GA 516-517 MT 602-626 CA 261-267
FL 518-519 ID *Guam, American Samoa, 268-302
OH 520 WY Northern Mariana Islands, 303-317
IN 521-524 CO Philippine Islands 318-361 IL 525
NM 362-386 MI 526-527 AZ 627-699
unassigned, for future use 700-728
Railroad workers through 1963, then discontinued 729-899 unassigned, for future use
900-999 not valid SSNs, but were used for program purposes when state aid to the aged, blind and disabled was converted to a federal program administered by SSA.
http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2010/08/13/your-social-security-number-may-not-be-unique-to-you/
https://annualcreditreport.experian.com/AnnualCreditReport/cac/ReportSummary2.do
https://www.myidscore.com/
http://w2.eff.org/Privacy/ID_SSN_fingerprinting/ssn_structure.article
http://stevemorse.org/ssn/ssn.html
Labels:
SSN
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
