Baud v. Carroll

Middle District of Tennessee.


Baud v. Carroll, 2011 WL 338001 (Sixth Cir. Feb. 4, 2011) (Cole) (Published at ConsiderChapter13.org 2/14/11)

The applicable commitment period of a Chapter 13 plan requires payments to be made over a time equal to the applicable commitment period; a debtor’s projected disposable income excludes benefits received under the Social Security Act; and there is no exception to the temporal requirement for debtors with a negative projected disposable income