Showing posts with label Florida; Foreclosure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Florida; Foreclosure. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Figueroa v. Szymoniak et al

The text below is from an article (that was) on Mandelman Matters:

The suit alleges that Szymoniak, and other lawyers with whom she worked, committed legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and fraud…. against a fellow homeowner at risk of foreclosure.

The plaintiff in the suit alleges that in 2010, over a period of roughly six months, Lynn Szymoniak was his attorney, and that she led him to believe that she would be filing a “Qui Tam,” or False Claims action in which HE was to be the “RELATOR,” and SHE, his legal counsel.

Had that been what occurred, the $18 million award would have gone to the plaintiff… and not to Ms. Szymoniak… but instead the Qui Tam lawsuit that was filed named Lynn Szymoniak as the “RELATOR,” and so Lynn and her lawyers divided up the multi-million award without ever mentioning anyone else being involved.

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/florida/flsdce/0:2013cv61020/420208/#!

http://mandelman.ml-implode.com/category/florida-foreclosure-help/

Qui tam Defention:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qui_tam

Monday, September 16, 2013

Banks Are Still Breaking Knocking Down Doors

Safeguard Properties is breaking into homes on behalf of BoA nationwide. The scrutiny threatens to ensnare JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citibank and other lenders that depend on the firms. Legal aid offices in California, Nevada, Florida, Michigan and New York say calls about Safeguard’s aggressive tactics rank among the top complaints.On Monday, Illinois became the first state to take on the property management firms legally, contending in a lawsuit that Safeguard wrongfully dispossessed hundreds of homeowners in the state.

In suing Safeguard, Lisa Madigan, the attorney general, contends that the company broke into homes despite stark evidence that homeowners still lived in them, bullied tenants into leaving even though they had no legal obligation to do so and, in some instances, damaged the very homes they were sent to protect, according to the suit. Once a homeowner is more than 45 days late on mortgage payments, lenders typically send out the maintenance firms to determine whether the properties have been abandoned. As of June, more than 800,000 properties were in foreclosure or owned by banks, according to RealtyTrac, a real estate data provider. Safeguard alone has had about 14 million work orders this year. which have “failed to supervise these firms.”

Under the terms of the National Mortgage Settlement, reached between five of the nation’s biggest banks and 49 state attorneys general, mortgage lenders are required to increase oversight of third-party vendors. The lenders said that they diligently monitored Safeguard’s performance

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/09/09/invasive-tactic-in-foreclosures-draws-scrutiny/?_r=1&utm_source=Sept+17+2013+email&utm_campaign=9%2F16%2F13&utm_medium=email

If they do not have a writ of possession they do not have a right to enter an occupied home.


FHA eases rules for borrowers after bankruptcy, foreclosure

The Federal Housing Administration wants to make it easier for people who have defaulted on their mortgages to get a new home loan with FHA backing.

But there's a catch, to qualify borrowers must show that their foreclosure or bankruptcy was caused by external economic factors, reducing their income by 20% or more for six months. You can't have quit your job or have been fired for cause.

If you can demonstrate such a pay cut, job loss or decline in business income now must spend only one year making timely rent and credit-card payments before they can apply to buy a home with an FHA-insured loan.

Generally borrowers are not eligible for a new FHA loan until three years after a foreclosure or two years after a bankruptcy. Previously, the death of a spouse or a medical emergency had been exceptions that could cut the wait to a year; now loss of income is listed as an extenuating circumstance as well.


Friday, June 28, 2013

Effective July 1, 2013 in 6th Circuit

http://www.jud6.org/LegalCommunity/LegalPractice/AOSAndRules/aos/aos2013/2013-026w-attachlistforweb.htm

FFor each residential mortgage foreclosure case, the Plaintiff/Lender’s attorney must:

a.       File a verified complaint in accordance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.110(b) and §702.015, Fla. Stat. (2013).

b.      File with the complaint a verified Form A - Plaintiff’s Certificate.  If the case involves multiple plaintiffs, only one Form A - Plaintiff’s Certificate must be filed.  The Form A - Plaintiff’s Certificate, which must be used, is Attachment A to this Administrative Order.  Previous versions of Form A must not be used.  The forms and information needed by the Plaintiff/Lender should be listed in Form A and uploaded to the web enabled information platform maintained by the Foreclosure Program Manager.  The forms should not be filed with Form A and are not required to be served with Form A.

c.       File with the complaint a Form B - Notice to Homeowner, which contains information for the homeowner on mediation, information on how to request mediation, the options that might be available at mediation, and other resources for the homeowner.  Form B – Notice to Homeowner, is Attachment B to this Administrative Order.  Previous versions of Form B must not be used.

d.      Within one business day of the assignment of a case number but not later than five  business days after the filing of the foreclosure case, electronically upload to the web enabled information platform maintained by the Foreclosure Program Manager, a verified Form A, with the forms needed by the Plaintiff/Lender; the case number, including the section judge number; and the contact information for the Plaintiff/Lender and the Defendant/Borrower, including telephone numbers and email addresses if known.
2.      The Clerk of the Circuit Court shall not issue a summons in a residential mortgage foreclosure case until a Plaintiff/Lender files a verified complaint, a Form A – Plaintiff’s Certificate, and a Form B - Notice to Homeowner.

3.      For every residential mortgage foreclosure case filed, the process server must note on the return of service that the summons was served with the complaint, Form A – Plaintiff’s Certificate, and Form B - Notice to Homeowner.

II.                 MEDIATION

A.      Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Cases

1.      Any party may file a Motion for Mediation of a residential mortgage foreclosure case in accordance with section 44.102, Florida Statutes, and Rules of Civil Procedure 1.700- 1.730.  Attachment F-1, Plaintiff/Lenders’ Motion for Foreclosure Mediation, or Attachment F-2, Defendant/Borrower’s Motion for Foreclosure Mediation may be used to for that purpose.  Residential mortgage foreclosure cases referred to mediation will be referred to Mediation Managers, Inc., the Court’s contracted residential Foreclosure Program Manager.

2.      For every residential mortgage foreclosure case where a party files a Motion for Mediation or the Court on its own motion decides to order a case to mediation and notifies the Foreclosure Program Manager accordingly, the Foreclosure Program Manager must:

a.   Prepare an Order of Referral to Mediation and provide it to the Court along with a Case Status Sheet as directed. A sample Order of Referral is Attachment C to this Administrative Order.  The Order of Referral may be modified by the Court without amendment to this Administrative Order.

b.   If issued by the Court, provide a copy of the Order of Referral to the Plaintiff/Lender and Defendant/Borrower.  Service may be made by e-mail in accordance with Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516.

c.   Assign a mediator unless the parties:
(i) notify the Foreclosure Program Manager in writing within 10 days of the service of the Order of Referral that they have agreed upon a mediator other than through the Foreclosure Program Manager, or 
(ii) file a joint stipulation with the Court with a copy to the Foreclosure Program Manager requesting to opt out of mediation.
As permitted by Rule of Civil Procedure 1.720(j) the appointment of mediators to foreclosure cases will not be by strict rotation, but rather will be assigned by the Foreclosure Program Manager.  Only certified circuit civil mediators who are trained in mortgage foreclosure cases may be assigned by the Foreclosure Mediation Program.  
d.   Encourage the Defendant/Borrower to participate in voluntary financial counseling.

e.   If the Defendant/Borrower does not have an attorney, inform the Defendant/Borrower of his or her right to consult with an attorney and also advise of the availability of pro bono, lawyer referral, and legal aid services.

f.    Explain mediation procedures to the Defendant/Borrower, time limits for participation in mediation, and the consequences of non-compliance.
g.   Collect the mediation fee of $650 from the Plaintiff/Lender, except as otherwise provided in the Order of Referral.
h. In order to prepare for mediation and reduce obstacles to communication in mediation, and consistent with Florida Rule for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators 10.220, within 30 days from service of the Order of Referral, 
(i)   confirm with the Plaintiff/Lender that the only forms and documents needed by the Plaintiff/Lender to participate in mediation were identified in Form A.  If additional information or forms are needed by the Plaintiff/Lender to participate in mediation, convey that information to the Defendant/Borrowers and their attorney, if any.
(ii)  obtain from the Defendant/Borrowers or their attorney, if any, all the forms and information required by the Plaintiff/Lender that are necessary to conduct the mediation. 
(iii) submit the forms and information provided by the Defendant/Borrowers to the Plaintiff/Lender.
(iv) if the Defendant/Borrower submitted Defendant/Borrower’s Request for Plaintiff/Lender’s Disclosure for Mediation, which is Attachment D to this Administrative Order, obtain the information from the Plaintiff/Lender and provide it to the Defendant/Borrower. 
These preparations for mediation may be done in person, by telephone, or by electronic submission as determined by the Foreclosure Program Manager.  The Foreclosure Program Manager must provide the forms and information by uploading them to a secure web platform, by encrypted email, or by other secure means to protect the confidentiality of the information.
i.    Within 30 days from the submission of the required documents to the Plaintiff/Lender, conduct a mediation conference.  If the Plaintiff/Lender requests additional information that was not identified in Form A or in subsequent communications to the Foreclosure Program Manager, do not begin the mediation conference but reschedule the mediation conference. 
j.    If the Plaintiff/Lender fails to appear at the mediation conference, or appears at mediation but requests additional information that was not identified in Form A or in subsequent communications to the Foreclosure Program Manager, assess a $200.00 rescheduling fee. 
k.   Facilitate arrangements for the Plaintiff/Lender’s representative to appear by telephone at the mediation conference if authorized by the Court in the Order of Referral.
l.    Ensure that the mediator’s report is timely submitted to the Court;

mIf the Defendant/Borrower has obtained a stay of the foreclosure action from the United States Bankruptcy Court, suspend activities under the Order of Referral.  When the stay is lifted, continue with the mediation process.
n.   If the Defendant/Borrower does not timely provide the information necessary to participate in mediation or does not appear at mediation and does not cooperate in timely rescheduling the mediation, submit a Notice of Defendant/Borrower Nonparticipation in the Foreclosure Mediation Program to the Court, which is Attachment E to this Administrative Order.

o.   If the Plaintiff/Lender does not timely provide the forms and information necessary for mediation, does not provide the Plaintiff/Lender’s Disclosure for Mediation, or does not appear at mediation and does not cooperate in timely rescheduling the mediation, prepare an Order to Show Cause for the Court as directed.
p.   Prepare statistical reports to the Court as required.

q.   Notify the Court as directed of all cases where a Notice of Defendant/Borrower Nonparticipation was filed and all cases that reached impasse at mediation.


3.      The Plaintiff/Lender, Foreclosure Program Manager, information technology provider, and any other third-party vendor must keep confidential all personal financial information and any other protected information disclosed by the Defendant/Borrower.  This information may not be released except as authorized or permitted by federal or state law, or with the written consent of the Defendant/Borrower, or as authorized by the Court.  Any violation of this provision will subject the violator to all available civil and criminal sanctions.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Free Million Dollar Condo

http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/06/23/v-fullstory/3466893/condo-association-beats-bank-in.html

It is a condominium association’s version of winning the lotto. US Bank missed its deadline to file for foreclosure on a million-dollar condo unit by 10 days.


Thursday, June 20, 2013

DOJ suit against Countrywide

http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/hce/caselist.php

Get Forms and information at the above site

Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Former Employees Say

Bank of America employees regularly lied to homeowners seeking loan modifications, denied their applications for made-up reasons, and were rewarded for sending homeowners to foreclosure, according to sworn statements by former bank employees.

http://www.propublica.org/article/bank-of-america-lied-to-homeowners-and-rewarded-foreclosures


Sunday, June 16, 2013

Scott Fast Tracks Foreclosures

http://www.bizjournals.com/southflorida/news/2013/06/10/governor-scott-signs-foreclosure-fast.html


Your foreclosure defense just got shot down!    My advise file Chapter 13 and do a  31% payment on your mortgage with your plan listed as  modify/surrender and request mediation.

Saturday, June 15, 2013

A look at a Foreclosure Mill

8:2012cv01598
 Hillsbourogh CountyFester v Gilbert Garcia Group PA
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/florida/flmdce/8:2012cv01598/273758/
Law Suit by Former Employee- Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act

8:10-cv-00020-RAL-AEP
Middle District of Florida
Langlois v. Traveler's Insurance Company et al
Assigned to: Judge Richard A. Lazzara
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli
Demand: $270,000
Case in other court: usca, 10-10308-B
          10-15753A
Cause: 31:3731 Fraud
https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?405619025138098-L_1_0-1


8:12-cv-01396-SDM-EAJ
Middle District of Florida
Andrade v. Gilbert Garcia Group, P.A. et al
Assigned to: Judge Steven D. Merryday
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins
Cause: 29:201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Andrade v. Gilbert Garcia Group, P.A. et al
Assigned to: Judge Steven D. Merryday
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins
Cause: 29:201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?730321437067868-L_1_0-1





Next up:

http://www.mfi-miami.com/2011/03/florida-foreclosure-mill-sends-man-bogus-demand-letter/

Florida Foreclosure Mill Sends Man Bogus Demand Letter

The lawyer who signed the form Ables received is Laura Walker with Tampa’s Gilbert Garcia Group. She didn’t return repeated phone calls over three days and declined to come out of her Tampa office to speak with a reporter. The only other attorney listed on their door, Michelle Garcia Gilbert, also didn’t return calls.






Rate Them

http://www.glassdoor.com/Overview/Working-at-Gilbert-Garcia-Group-PA-EI_IE582918.11,34.htm


http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/33607-fl-michelle-gilbert-1266121.html


duoliphotography.com/duoli-photo/gilbert-garcia-group-pa-laura...


Foreclosure Mill List
http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2010/07/23/foreclosure-attorneys-trustee-network/

FaceBook
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Gilbert-Garcia-Group-PA/189458907731116





Have any other articles or cases?   Send us a link.


Friday, May 17, 2013

ProSe wins Against BOA!!!

http://www.stayinmyhome.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Order-for-Pro-Se-Homeowner.pdf

In Hillsborough County Case No. 10-CA-20354, Bank of America declared a homeowner in default, then sued for foreclosure.  The homeowner represented himself in court, arguing, essentially, that he was not in default and that BOA had applied payments to his account improperly.

Shapiro, Fishman & Gache, L.L.P was BOA attorney

Monday, May 13, 2013

Magistrates to handle Florida Foreclosure Cases


The Florida Supreme Court just issued this opinion, which amended Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.490 to authorize the use of magistrates (i.e. lawyers who are not judges) to preside over foreclosure hearings.  This sounds like a big change in foreclosure-world, and in some ways I suppose it is.  The prospect of a non-judge deciding a mortgage foreclosure case is certainly a big change for many consumers.
http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/decisions/2013/sc13-684.pdf

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Acceleration Notice



Florida law required only the bank “substantially comply” with the conditions precedent in paragraph 22,(sometimes paragraph 9) of the mortgage and the letter of acceleration which was sent comported with that standard.  

Verification of Complaint


Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal just issued an opinion in U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Wanio-Moore which seems to indicate that anyone can verify a foreclosure complaint consistent with the requirements of Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(b).  In fact, that person need not specify his/her position or title with that verification, as a mere signature is sufficient.  In the words of the Fifth District, “the trial court erred in concluding that a foreclosure verification must state must state the signer’s position” and “the rule does not require any information about the signer’s positional authority.” http://www.5dca.org/Opinions/Opin2013/040113/5D12-1746.op.pdf

Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal in Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co. v. Prevratil, where the Second District ruled that Deutsche Bank could satisfy its obligation to verify the foreclosure complaint under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(b) by having its servicer and attorney-in-fact, Select Portfolio Services, sign the verification. http://www.2dca.org/opinions/Opinion_Pages/Opinion_Pages_2013/March/March%2008,%202013/2D12-2030.pdf

Florida courts have long required some type of evidence – certainly something more than the filing of a complaint – to support a conclusion that one is “likely” to prevail.  See City of Jacksonville v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co., 634 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

What about when the Bank wrongly forecloses?


So you got a Summary Judgment in favor of the Homeowner that the Bank should not have foreclosed- now what?

In the bank’s view, the homeowner can’t resume making normal, monthly mortgage payments – not without paying all of the late charges, attorneys’ fees, and default interest since the alleged default, not to mention the monthly payments that accrued since the last payment was made.

The homeowner’s view, doing that would be ridiculous.  Why should a homeowner who was wrongly declared in default have to pay default interest, late charges, and attorneys’ fees where those charges would have been unnecessary if the bank hadn’t wrongly declared the default

Judge William Levens of Hillsborough County 's  Final Judgment not only denied a foreclosure, but it required the bank to reinstate the mortgage as of the date that payments stopped being accepted.  All default interest, late charges, attorneys’ fees – POOF, GONE.  The homeowner could resume making monthly, mortgage payments today as if the mortgage were never in default. http://pubrec3.hillsclerk.com/oncore/showdetails.aspx?id=16972127&rn=1&pi=0&ref=search


The Second District makes this ruling, it is binding law for every circuit judge in Florida and affirmed Judge Levens position of putting the parties back in the financial positions they would have been in had the foreclosure not occurred. The appellate court affirmed the judge’s ruling that the mortgage should be reinstated retroactive to the date that the bank wrongly stopped accepting monthly mortgage payments.


.

Motion to Dismiss


As long as a motion to dismiss is pending, the homeowner need not file an Answer, and without an Answer in place, the case isn’t “at issue” under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.440 and can’t be set for trial.  Hence, a motion to dismiss prevents a trial from being set.

On April 22, 2013, Florida’s First District Court of Appeal issued a written opinion in Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bokatka, Case No. 1D11-3356 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).  The lower court dismissed the foreclosure suit with prejudice and the First District reversed that ruling.  

The Court stated: In this case, we do not fault the trial judge for dismissing the bank’s initial complaint, which facially created a contradiction between who the bank alleged was the owner of the note (the bank) and whom the attached note and mortgage identified as the owner (Option One). The parties’ attempts to interject or examine materials outside the pleadings, dismissal without prejudice was appropriate simply to allow the bank an opportunity to amend its initial complaint to address this discrepancy and to fortify its allegations and attachments.

Even given this I do not favor Motion to Dismiss unless the plaintiff's error is egregious as they tend to angery the Court.

Motion to Dismiss



As long as the motion to dismiss is pending, the homeowner need not file an Answer, and without an Answer in place, the case isn’t “at issue” under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.440 and can’t be set for trial.  Hence, a motion to dismiss prevents a trial from being set.

On April 22, 2013, Florida’s First District Court of Appeal issued a written opinion in Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bokatka, Case No. 1D11-3356 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).  The lower court dismissed the foreclosure suit with prejudice and the First District reversed that ruling.  

The Court stated: In this case, we do not fault the trial judge for dismissing the bank’s initial complaint, which facially created a contradiction between who the bank alleged was the owner of the note (the bank) and whom the attached note and mortgage identified as the owner (Option One). The parties’ attempts to interject or examine materials outside the pleadings, dismissal without prejudice was appropriate simply to allow the bank an opportunity to amend its initial complaint to address this discrepancy and to fortify its allegations and attachments.

Bank Induced Default-Defense


Any homeowner who was duped to stop making payments under the auspices of a loan modification (only to ultimately realize the modification never came). See La Boutique of Beauty Academy, Inc. v. Meloy, 436 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (“because the mortgagee, by its own conduct, led appellees to believe acceleration would not occur following a late payment … we affirm the order granting summary judgment for the mortgagors”); Dale v. Jennings, 107 So. 175 (Fla. 1926); Kerber v. Chadan, Inc., 364 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). When a bank leads a homeowner to believe acceleration/foreclosure won’t occur after a default in payments – as it does when it tells a homeowner to default in order to get a loan modification – then it should not be able to foreclose.  In Meloy, the Fourth District affirmed a summary judgment for the homeowners where the bank led the homeowners to believe a foreclosure would not occur after the default. 

Florida HB 87


This legislation changes the landscape of foreclosure defense in some significant ways.

1.  Finality of Judgment:  Once a final judgment is entered in a mortgage foreclosure case, the property is sold to a third-party, and the appeal time has run, the mortgagor is precluded from getting title to the property back, even if the foreclosure was wrongful.  Instead of being able to ask for the judgment to be vacated under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540 up to a year after the judgment was entered – or, in some circumstances, many years post-judgment - the homeowner’s remedy is now limited to claims for money damages.
For obvious reasons, the title insurance industry was the driving force behind this aspect of the bill.

2.  Order to Show Cause:  Expedited Foreclosure:  Any lienholder (to include condo associations and homeowners’ associations) can ask the Court to issue an Order to show cause, forcing the homeowner to come to court and convince the Court not to enter an expedited foreclosure judgment.  If the homeowner doesn’t file the appropriate paperwork/defenses, a foreclosure judgment is entered at that hearing.  This sounds bad, but it’s similar to the existing version of Fla. Stat. 702.10, except it now enables any lienholder (as opposed to just the bank) to request the show cause hearing.

The condo and homeowners’ associations were the driving force behind this aspect of the bill.  They believe this will give them leverage to accelerate the mortgage foreclosure lawsuit when the bank is slow to prosecute the case. If you’re current on your association dues, the association probably won’t feel a reason to make this request.  If you’re behind on those payments, however, you run the risk that the association will cause that hearing to be set.  If you’re paying your dues and taking care of the house, they probably don’t care if the house is in foreclosure.  If you’re not paying your dues, however, then the association likely prefers that you get foreclosed so a new owner – who pays his dues – will get put in the house.
Don’t let a rather nominal association payment cause you problems on your mortgage foreclosure case.  Pay those dues!


3.  Order to Show Cause:  Monthly Mortgage Payments:  If a residential property is not owner-occupied, the plaintiff can ask the court to require the mortgagor to make normal monthly mortgage payments to the plaintiff during the foreclosure case.  If those payments are not made, then the mortgagor is removed from possession of the property even before the case is over.  If this happens, the homeowner can still defend the lawsuit, but will be removed from possession before the case is over. Similar to requesting rents be deposited into the Court with a  twist.

4.  Statute of Limitations:  On claims for deficiency, reduced to one year from five.

5.  Pleading requirements:  The new bill imposed a few new pleading requirements for plaintiffs.
(a)  The foreclosure plaintiff must plead it is the “holder” or its specific factual basis to foreclose in its Complaint.  This codifies what defense attorneys have been arguing in motions to dismiss for many months – it’s not enough to say you’re entitled to foreclose, you have to plead ultimate facts.
(b) If the plaintiff is suing on behalf of another entity, it must identify the document which sets forth that authority.
(c)  The plaintiff must file a certification under oath, upon filing suit, that it possesses the original Note.  If the note is lost, it must file an affidavit detailing the chain of assignments/transfers and must attach documents showing how ownership was acquired.





S

Monday, May 6, 2013

Stone V BankUnited

2013 Fla. App. Lexis 7207
May 3, 2013
2nd DCA
Case 2D12-980

Standing

1. Date of allonge
2. evidence of transfer of equitable interest
3. assignment from payee
4 receivership agreement

Florida Faster Foreclosures

http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/05/03/3378402/mortgage-foreclosures-bill-headed.html?utm_source=May+6+Email&utm_campaign=5%2F6%2F13&utm_medium=email


Florida lawmakers sent Gov. Rick Scott a bill Friday that is aimed at speeding up the residential mortgage foreclosure process in a state where the real estate market went into a tailspin during the national housing crisis. (HB 87)


The bill cleared the Senate on a 26-13 vote on the final day of the Legislature's 60-day session. It passed the House recently 87-26.


One key provision would reduce from five years to one year the amount of time for banks to go after foreclosed homeowners on deficiency judgments. Deficiencies are the difference between the money obtained from selling a foreclosed home and what the original homeowner still owes on it.


Homeowners could have limited time to show "a genuine issue of material fact or law" to avoid foreclosures.